Making the case for investment in the walking environment
Duration: March 2011 – May 2011
Sponsor: Living Streets
Project leader for WHO CC:>Sarah Burgess
This project involved a comprehensive literature review to provide the evidence based for investment in the walking environment. The team primarily reviewed three types of evidence:
- Cross-sectional studies in the academic literature examining the relationship between neighbourhood characteristics (eg density, connectivity, mix of use, public realm) and walking levels, health and well-being
- Evaluation studies of specific interventions aimed at improving the walking environment (eg home zones, shared use paths, 20 mph limits, Sustainable Travel Towns)
- Cost-benefit analyses and assessments of the cost effectiveness of investment in the walking environment.
The review also included a summary of the health, social, environmental and economic benefits of increased levels of walking.
The evidence from the cross-sectional studies shows utility walking levels are greater in places with mixed land uses, greater population density and street connectivity and provision of facilities for pedestrians. Recreational walking is influenced most by aesthetical quality of the walking environment.
Evaluations of walking interventions generally demonstrate positive road safety outcomes and positive user perceptions and high values for money have been estimated for these interventions compared to other transport interventions.
You can download the project report document from Living Streets.